The affections – and fighting temptation
So. How do you fight temptation?
Do you just … try harder? Do you just … remind yourself again and again that sin is bad, and that God hates it?
You’ll find that many Christians have a woefully inadequate understanding of how to deal with sin. You’d think that’s one of the most basic things about the Christian life that everyone would know – but surprisingly that’s not the case.
In fact most Christians you ask for advice will have very simplistic and ineffectual suggestions to make, which reflect the lack of understanding of the internal workings of the human heart. And that’s no surprise, because that’s what our age is like: brilliant at technology and manipulating the world ‘out there’ – but helpless at understanding what’s going on inside ourselves.
How then do we fight temptation?
Christians from a previous age understood very well the internal dynamics of the human heart, and knew how to equip themselves to stand strongly against temptation. The Puritans get a bad press, but I’ve done some study on them and in reality we have massive amounts to learn from them – in terms of their bravery in the face of opposition (many pastors lost their jobs for failing to compromise on theology), in terms of well thought out theology (they were reformed theologically) – but also in terms of understanding the ways of the human heart.
Last year I read a brilliant work by Thomas Chalmers called, The Expulsive Power of a New Affection. And it’s something that I believe everyone doing ministry ought to read – whether you’re a Bible study leader, a theological student, or a pastor. It’s very short, and you can get it on the Internet (get in in PDF here), but allow me to summarise his main points.
People won’t actually turn away from a sin because you tell them that it’s pleasure will only last a short while (though that may be true). Nor will they turn away from sin because it is has bad effects on them in this world (though that may also be true). Nor do will they turn away from a sin because you tell them that it will incur them God’s displeasure and judgment in the future (though that may also be true).
That’s because their affections have been captured by that sin. They love doing it, they love what it does for them – even though they may know intellectually it’ll only last a short while. And you can see this in Christians around you: people know that a thing is wrong – but it doesn’t stop them doing it. And keeping on telling them it’s wrong doesn’t really help in the long term – because their affections are set on it!
However you can see that sometimes people do turn away from a sin. But what has happened there isn’t that they have stopped loving that sin – instead they have grown in their love for something else, which is greater. That new thing has now captured their affections. Chalmers describes how the passions of a boy, is replaced by the passions of a young man, which is then replaced by the passions of an older man:
appetite, but it is because a manlier taste has now brought it into
subordination – and that the youth ceases to idolize pleasure, but it is
because the idol of wealth has become the stronger and gotten the ascendancy
and that even the love of money ceases to have the mastery over the heart of
many a thriving citizen, but it is because drawn into, the whirl of city
polities, another affection has been wrought into his moral system, and he is
now lorded over by the love of power.
It’s not as though the young man has mastered his love for pleasure (by being convinced of its vanity, say) – it’s just that he now has become mastered by an even greater love for money. And later on that man seems to not be driven by money – but that’s not because he’s controlled his love for money (by being convinced that it will earn him God’s displeasure). Instead he’s become mastered by an even greater love for power.
The way to deal with temptation, then, isn’t really to teach about how it is wrong, or how it will cause them harm in this life or the next. We must say these things, but that isn’t the real battle. The real battle is actually to show them the excellencies of God, who is the rightful occupier of our affections. To grow someone in their love for God – so that they will no longer be gripped by a love for pleasure, or money, or power. Chalmers says,
upon to part with the world, by a simple act of resignation. But may not the
heart be prevailed upon to admit into its preference another, who shall
subordinate the world, and bring it down from its wonted ascendancy? If the
throne which is placed there must have an occupier, and the tyrant that now
reigns has occupied it wrongfully, he may not leave a bosom which would rather
detain him than be left in desolation. But may he not give way to the lawful
sovereign, appearing with every charm that can secure His willing admittance,
and taking unto himself His great power to subdue the moral nature of man, and
to reign over it? In a word, if the way to disengage the heart from the
positive love of one great and ascendant object, is to fasten it in positive
love to another, then it is not by exposing the worthlessness of the former,
but by addressing to the mental eye the worth and excellence of the latter,
that all old things are to be done away and all things are to become new.
The way to fight temptation, then, is to see God in all his glory and grace – and for our hearts to be filled with joy and contentment in Christ, to be filled with awe and worship for God and a longing to see his face.
When we are doing that, we will find that the fight against temptation takes on a whole new character. Temptation is no longer an enormous and powerful boss-robot that we feel powerless to fight. Instead temptation becomes a small squeaky annoyance, whose puny squeaks for our attention are laughable. Just like a young man finds hop-scotch an embarrassingly childish pursuit. Or how an older man regards a younger man’s pursuit of money with bemusement.
And when this happens, I have seen people’s fight against pornography, or nagging their husband, or their desire for a boyfriend take on a whole new character. No longer are they gazing with longing at the thing they love and trying at the same time to will themselves to push it away – instead they are gazing at God in all his satisfying greatness, and they can’t imagine why people would want to chase after those other things in the first place.
In all this we have to point out that the fight is not ours alone – it is God’s Holy Spirit who alone can change our hearts. We can expose ourselves to God’s word and meditate on the glory and grace of God – but as we do so we must ask and pray and plead for a heart that loves God. Because it is only God himself who changes hearts and makes people grow in their love for him.
But this is how we fight temptation. Not just by telling ourselves it’s wrong (though sometimes we don’t know, and so we must do that). But by seeing the massive greatness of God – and praying that God would grow us in our love for him.
[ PS: be aware that Thomas Chalmers' language is a bit dated, but read it! and you'll find it transforms your understanding of ministry... ]
A few months ago I said the same thing to one of my youth group kids who was struggling to change his life. But you say it so much better than I did!How can we help people to grow in their love for God though? Is it just a matter of speaking the wonders of the gospel and singing the praises of our Lord and God, plus a good dose of prayer and patience? As the Scriptures warn/foretell, words often fall on hard hearts. Is there anything else we can do?
Thanks Andrew for the thoughtful blog and an introduction to Chalmers. I have to think more about this and to try it out myself. Just one observation. Someone commented recently on our generation\’s preoccupation with inwardness (the heart). He traced it back to the Romantic period and Schleiermacher in particular and later Johnathan Edwards. Schleiermarcher. This inwardenss is to be contrasted with an earlier emphasis on the gospel being from outside of us. We have shifted, he argues, from a doctrine of the Word to a doctrine of Faith. Now, human needs (even for godliness) and not the gospel are seen as inexhaustible. We are no longer the people of God who hears, trust and obey but people who seeks to connect with the logos within. Not saying that this is what you\’re saying but am concerned that this might add fuel to a growing shift of emphasis in our city.
Hey Andrew,Good stuff. An excellent reminder of affections and how they drive us. A much needed reminder.The classic case of course is the youth group leader who is now dating a non-christian girl. He knows that it is wrong, that is eventually harmful, that he is risking his own ministry and even shaming the name of God… he know it all, there is nothing you can tell him. But his affections are for the non-christian girl and nothing will shift him… until his affection for God grows deeper than his affection for the girl.This raises three general thoughts / questions in my mind…A. A Theological thought / question : Pietism?The pietism of Philipp Spener and even more so of Watchman Nee sees tripartite (spirit, soul and body) nature of man. The Spirit connects to God. The Soul is the intellect, the emotion and the will of man that should but does not always listen to the Spirit. The Body connects to the world and listens to the Soul.Nee (as well as John Sung and WangMingTao (for Asians) and Franke and Barber (for Europeans) to varying degrees – ) argue for the denying of Soul, since this is the seat of human desire and will and hence sin. When we deny the Soul, then the Spirit can directly control the Soul which in turn directly controls the body. Nee would go so far as to say (in the words of another great philosopher Bruce Lee in his rigorous and philosophically cogent work "Enter the Dragon") "Don\’t think… feel… it is like a finger pointing to the moon… don\’t look at the finger or you will miss all the heavenly glories". His caveat is that the man who does this is \’regenerate\’. Once you are regenerate (your Spirit and Soul are aligned) then you just go with your affections since they will automatically line up with God. At that point, you don\’t even need to think, you just intuitively know the will of God because you just listen to your Spirit.I wonder how the focus on the affections (mainly dealing with the soul) buys into this kind of Tripartite view of life. Are we arguing for denying the Soul (will, intellect even emotion). How do we deal with Paul saying that he beats his body and makes it his slave… not very nice… but overcoming his affections for no pain for the greater goal of godliness. Maybe we are saying that in all these cases, the greater affection overrides the lesser affection. Are the Christian Hedonists like Piper who call people to follow what they love (and by the way, the best pleasure you can have is God) right?Hmmm… the first point is long, so the next two will just be very framework style. ;DB. A Marketing thought / question : Selling affections?How do church leaders market to people that…God is better than football.God is better than beer – glug, glug, glug. God is better than cricket \’cause God\’s there all the year?or the asian version.God is better than study.God is better than food – char, siew, baow.God is better than ping-pong – \’cause God is fun right now. Under the sun, how can church compete with tv, internet, friends, workplaces etc.(of course… prayer and petition and the mighty hand of God can do anything). C. A Practical thought / question : Measuring change?How do we know our affections have changed?- Jonathan Edwards speaks much like Chalmers and focuses on the affects of a man as the driver for change and growth.- He also warns that many things that seem to be affections really aren\’t including great knowledge of God, strong emotions of closeness to God and even powerful ministries.Alrighty, too long already.Thanks again for blogging.YBICTom