Confucianism – and what leaders are meant to do
What are leaders meant to do? What makes for a good leader?
In Confucianism, the leader receives the Mandate of Heaven in order to rule. His task in ruling is to maintain harmony in the realm. And in particular it is to maintain the proper balance between heaven and earth, and between heaven and mankind. The fundamental idea in Confucian leadership is one of maintaining balance and stability and harmony.
This is related to the key Confucian concept of zhong 中 which is often translated as ‘middle’ or ‘centre’. But in key Confucian works such as The Doctrine of the Mean (中庸) zhong means much more than that merely ‘centre’ in a geometric sense. In order to preserve the mandate of heaven, the ideal ruler must attain the virtue of zhong in their own person. It is the ability to avoid extremes, to be calm and dignified and measured in the midst of turmoil. And this virtue allows them to occupy the central territory as the ruler.
You must remember that Confucius taught during a time of great upheaval in China, when the different kingdoms were constantly at war with each other. His great desire was to bring about peace and harmony back to a land – and Confucius taught that it was the virtue of the ruler that influenced others around him – bringing propriety and harmony to the land.
And you can imagine the picture: government ministers are rushing to and fro, flustered and alarmed at the latest rumours that a neighbouring state has incited an uprising in their own territory. They speak in raised, shrill voices. Their decisions are reactive and impulsive. But in their midst is one who is calm and measured. He does not run or shout – he sits calmly. He is not consumed by worry or anger – he is measured. Ah! here is someone worthy of the title of ruler! Because, you see, he behaves like a ruler does. He understands the way of heaven, and the way of man. He has the virtue of zhong 中 – and he exudes that to others around him.
What then does the leader ‘do’? You can see then that in Confucianism leadership isn’t really about ‘doing’. Instead it’s about maintaining harmony and stability when everything is unsettled. And that’s achieved by maintaining a calm, moderate, dignified outlook.
Notice that this is quite different understanding of what the leader does, compared to the Western approach. Western leadership is all about the leader taking people from one place to a better place. Fundamental to the Western approach to leadership is change! movement! direction!
| Western | Confucian |
|
|
What does this mean for churches influenced by Confucianism – such as Chinese churches?
It means that the ideal pastor is thought of as someone who does not upset the boat. But rather mediates a stable and harmonious community. When there are distressing times, the pastor is the one who is expected to be level headed and calm and unperturbed – and exudes that calm to others. When people are upset he is able to go to them and appease them. When people have set the church in turmoil he can bring peace once again.
And it means that the pastor who intentionally generates change. who makes people have to now do something different. who disrupts harmony by unnecessarily raising issues from the past, who causes people to feel ‘bad’ – this is thought of as a bad pastor, because he does not fit the model of ideal rulership. He does not exhibit the virtue of zhong 中 or promote harmony.
As a result, some pastors conform themselves to this role, because this is also their image of an ideal ruler. And so they look to maintain the harmony of their church community – never being extreme, but always being measured. Never at the edge, but always with the majority. Never generating conflict, always maintaining harmony.
And once again, you can imagine the scene: the deacons are worried and troubled, they don’t know what to do. But in the centre, the pastor sits: calm, untroubled. “Why do you worry?” he asks calmly. “It will work itself out in time.” And the deacons feel themselves pause and step down a notch, because of his calm. Ah! here truly is someone worthy of the title of pastor!
Which explains why in Chinese churches, some pastors are loved, while others are despised. Yes, those despised ones may be called ‘pastor’ – and in fact they may be great leaders in the Western sense! But they are not thought of as truly fitting that title of ‘pastor’ – because what is fitting is someone who exemplifies zhong 中.

I don’t know how I bumped into your blog, and I am very happy that there is someone in Sydney that I feel I can exchange my ideas with. Wish you don’t mind my grammar because English is my 2nd language.
Confucianism does have significant influence to Chinese churches. The real questions are the magnitude of influence, and in what ways it affects the philosophy and practices of ministry. The heaviest influences exist in churches with Taiwanese background (unbroken traditional Chinese influence), then HK and SE Asia (a mix of Chinese and Western influence) including migrant churches, and then mainland Chinese churches (suffered from a relatively long period of Cultural revolution and ‘historical materialism’ under communist influence).
My understanding of Confucianism, however, is not as dichotomised as your table suggest. But I would offer two observations: Firstly, my limited understanding of a real Confucian gentlemen (君子) is supposed to know when to act and when to abstain, when to move and when to be calm, when to be in the front and when to be at the centre, when to generate change and when to foster stability, and the provision of Both direction and example for others to follow. The central premise is to working in harmony with and according to the way (or logos) of the heaven (or universe). It is a very similar to the Christian concept of walking with God.
Secondly, I observed that the biblical faith especially OT have more in common with the Confucian ideals, while in NT the church and its mission is more accord with the Western philosophy (of conquest and change). I can immediately think of bible verses and passages that associate both sides of the table.
I don’t think Chinese churches in general oppose to change. The onus, however, is always on the leaders – Western or Confucian – to skilfully introduce changes from the status quo Without ripping the church apart. I have seen leaders having the best intention to lead their churches to grab gospel opportunities and adopt aggressive discipleship etc., but ending up with ripping the church apart, and then they build it up again, and ripping it apart again a few years later, the cycle goes on and on.
Like M3 overseas missionaries, cultural sensitivities should always be one of the considerations in ministry. Church is not a machine or inorganic entities that can be reduced to mathematically quantifiable goals and growth, it is the people of God.
I believe 1.5 gen or 2nd gen of pastors, have the possibility of practically leading the Chinese-background churches to where God wants us to be, because they have been equipped, consciously or unconsciously, the ideals of both cultures. Hopefully the wisdom to live out the biblical mandate practically in the particular mix of culture can be developed, along with the wisdom to avoid the pitfalls of both.
Wilson Fong
CABC-WR